-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
No more Windows support
,----[ Quote ]
| Itâs not entirely their fault. Windows, for release after release, is just
| one big broken promise. The slick happy interface promises a smooth,
| high-tech, trouble-free experience, and Microsoftâs marketing takes full
| advantage of that misconception. But that promise is never, ever fulfilled.
| Sooner or later, on every computer itâs installed on, Windowsâ inherent flaws
| break the system. We all know what happens. More and more frequent reboots.
| Slow performance. Junkware and crapware and spyware slowing things down, and
| even if theyâre not there to do it, the scanners to catch them slow things
| down on their own. Viruses and incompatible .dll files and broken drivers
| and too many things being loaded as services that have no reason to exist.
| Disk fragmentation and registry cruft. Eventually the system gets too
| weighted down with all this crap to be usable, and it grinds to a useless
| halt, and you have to reinstall the operating system to clean things up and
| start fresh.
|
| [...]
|
| So Iâm cutting everyone off. Well, no, not everyone. Iâll still help my
| non-technical friends who are running Linux now, because I got them started
| on it. But strangely, they donât seem to need much help, after the initial
| learning curve.
`----
http://www.dwasifar.com/?p=723
Recent:
Ubuntu Tech Support: It's All A Matter Of Timing
,----[ Quote ]
| Any company considering Ubuntu, however, should also pay close attention to
| how Canonical, Ubuntu's corporate sheperd, handles technical support. Once
| you understand Canonical's support strategy, you will also understand why
| this version of Ubuntu server looks a bit more appealing to bleeding-edge
| surfers than to mainstream small-business IT users.
|
| "Technical support" means two things here: professional technical support
| from Canonical, and maintenance updates for a particular release on an
| as-needed basis. The first form of support is available on a paid basis for
| those users who require it; the second form, like the Ubuntu Linux releases
| themselves, is always free.
`----
http://www.bmighty.com/blog/main/archives/2009/04/ubuntu_tech_sup.html
A Perception of Lack of Support for Open Source Should Not Stop Adoption of
Linux
,----[ Quote ]
| People seem hesitant to accept open source because âthere is no company
| behind itâ like Microsoft. First of all, from an OS standpoint, support of
| Linux distros by the companies that publish them has come a long way in the
| past few years. Companies like Canonical (the distributor of Ubuntu Linux),
| Novell (SuSE Linux), and Red Hat offer support programs that can assist you
| with your problem, although these programs vary in pricing and how they are
| conducted. The point is, however, that despite the fact that the OS is
| developed, maintained, and improved by an amorphous body of programmers (the Â
| open source community), there are real companies behind the distros that will
| be there if you have a question or problem. Â Â Â Â
`----
http://lawtech.wordpress.com/2008/03/01/support-linux-open-source/
The top Linux support weaknesses, then and now
,----[ Quote ]
| In 2003, SearchEnterpriseLinux.com visited the Linux support landscape
| with a list of Linux support weaknesses. A lot has happened over the
| past four years, as is evident in the success of Red Hat and
| Novell's subscription-based support models and the meteoric
| rise of commercial-grade Ubuntu support, to name a few.
`----
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1262974,00.html
Related:
Microsoft's Genuine Advantage
,----[ Snippet ]
| A lot of managers are afraid to use Open Source Software, because it
| doesn't come with any support. Of course that isn't true. It is a classical
| piece of FUD. And then again, how much is support worth?
|
| [...]
|
| MS: Â Microsoft Support. Good morning, sir. Can I help you.
| IC: Â Windows displays some strange message on my screen.
| MS: Â What's the message, sir.
| IC: Â ReadStringFromInf: UpdSpGetLineText failed: 0xe0000102; Microsoft
| Windows is Not Present
| MS: Â May I have your product key, sir.
| IC: Â [gives completely valid product key]
| MS: Â Ok, sir. Can you please reboot your PC?
| IC: Â Will that solve the problem?
| MS: Â Please reboot your PC, sir.
| IC: Â Ok, ok, wait a minute.
| MS: Â Please call us again if you eXPerience any more problems. Have a
| nice day, sir. [click]
`----
http://thebeez.vnunetblogs.com/the_beez_speaks/2006/09/microsofts_genu.html
I work for MS but even I struggle to get a hot-fix
,----[ Quote ]
| The problem took 260 minutes to resolve from start to
| finish and an estimated 90 minutes of Ledgard's time,
| not including the time it took to write-up his problems...
| Still, the frustrations experienced by Ledgard give
| a salutary lesson that Microsoft's online product
| support is mediocre, at best, and will surely strike
| a chord with many long-suffering sys admins.
`----
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/24/ms_hot-fix_hell/
The top Linux support weaknesses, then and now
,----[ Quote ]
| In 2003, SearchEnterpriseLinux.com visited the Linux support landscape
| with a list of Linux support weaknesses. A lot has happened over the
| past four years, as is evident in the success of Red Hat and
| Novell's subscription-based support models and the meteoric
| rise of commercial-grade Ubuntu support, to name a few.
`----
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1262974,00.html
Microsoft Y2K bug circa 1998?
,----[ Quote ]
| On January 8th of this week my parents received a phone call which they
| dodged because the call was coming through at 11:00 p.m. at night.
|
| The next day they retrieved the voicemail message which was from Microsoft
| technical support calling me back to see if my problem has been resolved.
|
| [...]
|
| I remember in the past year or so when I called Microsoft and the problem was
| not resolved (BSOD after Microsoft patch) that Microsoft did call me back the
| next day to see if i made any progress in my little computer crises (which I
| though was super cool of them... I was really impressed)...
| but wait a second .... or wait 315,569,260 seconds ....
| Microsoft hadn't done this (call me back that is) the first time I called ...
| and I called many years ago.... but that must have been when I was living at
| home with my parents..... which is why they called me at my parents phone
| number.
`----
http://bicbickers.blogspot.com/2008/01/microsoft-y2k-bug-circa-1998.html
Top 10 reasons why Microsoft's Xbox 360 Customer Service is "teh br0ken".
,----[ Quote ]
| So there you have it Microsoft, the Top 10 reasons your support
| system is "teh br0ken", from my admittedly short experience with
| it. When I'd assumed a company of your size would set the standard
| for customer service, I didn't mean the standard by which to do
| better than...
|
| I realize it's probably no great revelation that their customer
| service sucks, but come on, why can't they fix this? Can they
| only fix simple things? That makes them useless for people with
| "real" problems.
`----
http://www.gamercastnetwork.com/forums/showpost.php?p=28315&postcount=68
Another Xbox Support Nightmare
,----[ Quote ]
| We seem to be receiving an increasing number of horror stories from
| Xbox 360 owners who have had to call Microsoft's Bangalore-based
| tech support call center. When your reason for calling is a
| bricked console, one would think it would be a painless and
| quick procedure to get the thing replaced or repaired.
| Apparently not the case, according to Brent from Consumerist.com
`----
http://www.gwn.com/news/story.php/id/10875/
Xbox 360s Still Dying, Customer Service Still Crap
,----[ Quote ]
| "They'll handle everything, they're great. They'll even pay for shipping
| and Fed-Ex it for you. That's what they did for my systems (yes, plural)
| when they died."
`----
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/xbox-360/xbox-360s-still-dying-customer-service-still-crap-222843.php
Which is better for technical support
,----[ Quote ]
| I have found in general that with open source support you often get
| more than what you pay for but with closed source support, by some of
| the biggest names in software, the support is often lacking in the
| value department. With open source asking for support has generally
| resulted in a solution within a week and I have never paid for it.
| However with closed source companies I have open tickets that have
| not been resolved in months. With open source I can communicate
| directly with the author(s) of the program and work closely with
| them to find a solution. Closed source on the other hand has just
| requested information, verified the bug and then informed us that
| the solution may be available in the next release of the program.
`----
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/linux/locutus/archives/which-is-better-for-technical-support-13621
http://tinyurl.com/ygspn7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkqVGzwACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7mvwCfQI4dpQ64ne8eqdcgb9k+6c2d
ObIAnjOwmSWyPOSU4FcyTcVETZOyamY6
=hbRW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
