Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Why Extremely High Damages Make a Farce of the USPTO

  • Subject: [News] Why Extremely High Damages Make a Farce of the USPTO
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:49:40 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Why Do We Let Juries Set Patent Award Damages? Appeals Court Throws Out Another Jury Award

,----[ Quote ]
| There is a mythology in the US about the value and importance of patents -- and 
| because of that, it's not surprising that patent trials involving juries quite 
| often end with the patent holder being declared victor, and a huge amount being 
| awarded by the jury. Microsoft and Alcatel-Lucent have been involved in a whole 
| series of patent battles recently. 
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090913/1735526175.shtml

USPTO is a barrier to advancement.


Recent:

Commerce Secretary, New USPTO Head Suggesting They Want More Patents, Approved Faster

,----[ Quote ]
| Two separate stories concerning statements from those in charge of the patent
| system suggest that the new administration isn't about to help fix the
| problems in the patent system, but is eagerly looking to make them worse. It
| starts with new USPTO Director David Kappos, who some thought would recognize
| problems with the patent system from his years dealing with those problems at
| IBM. While IBM is a massive patent stockpiler, over the past few years it's
| at least indicated some recognition that the system is broken.
|
| [...]
|
| The real problem, which becomes evident in reading the article is that since
| the USPTO is funded based on patent application fees, it has every incentive
| in the world, as an institution, to approve more patents. The more patents it
| approves, the more applications it gets, which means more money as well.
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20090827/0318266019.shtml
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqurGQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4UwwCfdKWipxpaoazmQsjnG4VxT22/
880An1rZG+PYfckv/BuQ94pJJgbFt1s3
=Gnbh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index