Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] XP is Vulnerable with No Patch Planned, EVER!

  • Subject: [News] XP is Vulnerable with No Patch Planned, EVER!
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:41:15 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Microsoft Says No TCP/IP Patches For XP

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft says it won't patch Windows XP for a pair of bugs it quashed 
| Sept. 8 in Vista, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008. The news 
| adds Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) and SP3 to the no-patch list that 
| previously included only Windows 2000 Server SP4. 'We're talking about code 
| that is 12 to 15 years old in its origin, so backporting that level of code 
| is essentially not feasible,' said security program manager Adrian Stone 
| during Microsoft's monthly post-patch Webcast, referring to Windows 2000 
| and XP.
`----

http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/09/15/0131209/Microsoft-Says-No-TCPIP-Patches-For-XP

Microsoft: No TCP/IP patches for you, XP

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft late last week said it won't patch Windows XP for a pair of bugs 
| it quashed Sept. 8 in Vista, Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008.
| 
| The news adds Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) and SP3 to the no-patch list | 
| that previously included only Windows 2000 Server SP4.
| 
| [...]
| 
| The bugs in question are in Windows' implementation of TCP/IP, the Web's 
| default suite of connection protocols. All three of the vulnerabilities 
| highlighted in the MS09-048 update were patched in Vista and Server 2008. 
| Only two of the trio affect Windows Server 2000 and Windows XP, Microsoft 
| said in the accompanying advisory, which was refreshed on Thursday.
| 
| [...]
| 
| During the Q&A, however, Windows users repeatedly asked Microsoft's 
| security team to explain why it wasn't patching XP, or if, in certain 
| scenarios, their machines might be at risk. "We still use Windows XP and we 
| do not use Windows Firewall," read one of the user questions. "We use a 
| third-party vendor firewall product. Even assuming that we use the Windows 
| Firewall, if there are services listening, such as remote desktop, wouldn't 
| then Windows XP be vulnerable to this?"
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138007/Microsoft_No_TCP_IP_patches_for_you_XP

So long, XP.

Great news for GNU/Linux!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqwCfsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7+jQCfbXgBgQ7+BaIydAlatv+ASqsW
jQ8An0dth5uRPX/aYIIakep6MMMmPlEL
=kbx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index