-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Homer on Thursday 24 Sep 2009 23:30 : \____
> Here's something I don't understand about the Global Warming debate:
> Why is there a debate at all?
>
> Let's assume, for one minute, that the Global Warming denialists are
> actually correct, and that dumping billions of tonnes of toxic crap into
> the environment every year does /not/ in fact have /any/ influence on
> Earth's changing environmental conditions (such as melting polar ice,
> for example), and that the /real/ cause is some sort of natural cycle of
> solar activity - or even that global warming is not occurring at /all/.
>
> Let's pretend that's true.
>
> So ... /what/ exactly is the justification for dumping billions of
> tonnes of toxic crap into the environment every year?
>
> That's like saying, it's OK for my neighbour's dog to crap on my lawn,
> because ... it doesn't cause global warming.
>
> Or, it's OK for me to pour cyanide into a fish tank, because ... it
> doesn't cause global warming.
>
> Isn't there a rather unsubtle point the whole Global Warming debate is
> missing?
Another good example is deforestation and oxygen supply.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"I can't see any data coming out of this Tolkien Ring card."
"Well of course not, it confers invisibility." -- Anthony de Boer
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 4088500k total, 417880k used, 3670620k free, 264040k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkq7/LcACgkQU4xAY3RXLo71gQCglAQ7OqVklugggh6FUU41bgzc
kGAAoKxTDPTBARxEez/+xz1SoQDVZfOi
=7+Z+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
