-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Economist introduces pay-wall for archive articles
,----[ Quote ]
| The Times and Sunday Times yesterday revealed plans for a
| readers' club with a Â50 membership fee to non-
| subscribers, another example of newspapers attempting to
| develop new revenue streams from loyal readers rather
| than following a high-volume strategy.
`----
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/06/economist-pay-wall-archive
Monetizing Speed: AP May Charge for 30 Min Lead
,----[ Quote ]
| After a summer of establishing blogger guidelines and
| fair use, the Associated Press is considering charging
| online customers for a 20-30 minute head start on
| breaking news stories. According to a report by the AP's
| Jeremiah Marquez, the AP's chief executive Tom Curley
| made the announcement at the Hong Kong Foreign
| Correspondents' Club. Curley suggested that because the
| AP licenses stories to major hubs like Google, Yahoo and
| Microsoft's MSN, these outlets would be willing to pay
| for scoops.
`----
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/monetizing_speed_ap_may_charge_for_30_min_lead.php
Recent:
Associated Press will sell you a license to quote the public domain
,----[ Quote ]
| They tell me I have to use the sentence "exactly as written" and heaven help
| me if I don't include the complete footer with their copyright boilerplate.
`----
http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/02/associated-press-wil-1.html
Ripped Off News? Or Spreading The News?
,----[ Quote ]
| It appears that some (certainly not all) in the mainstream press still seems
| to have problems understanding the value of getting people to talk about what
| they reported on. They seem to come at this viewpoint from the old line of
| thinking that a reporter reported on the story and that was it. The story was
| done. But that's not the way the news works. A news story is simply a part of
| the conversation. It may be a starting point in a bigger effort -- which is
| why it's important for so many people today to be able to spread and share
| the news with others. Yet, if you come at things from a viewpoint of the
| newspaper article being a final and definitive word, then suddenly such
| sharing and spreading is viewed as "theft" or being "ripped off" and the
| person promoting and discussing and sharing your work is suddenly a parasite.
`----
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090802/1528325739.shtml
AP Charges $12.50 To Quote 5 Words
,----[ Quote ]
| The AP is known for having some fairly unconventional tactics toward the use
| of their content online. Sure, a company should be concerned with how their
| content is being used online... but how far is too far?
`----
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/08/03/ap-charges-1250-to-quote-5-words
AP Launches Open Source Ascribenation Project
,----[ Quote ]
| Meanwhile, a small suggestion to the AP: Get your legal department's
| footprints off your home page (where the top item is "Protecting AP's
| Intellectual Property"). In fact, push them to the nether regions of the
| website. It's not friendly stuff.
`----
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/ap-launches-open-source-ascribenation-project
By The AP's Own Logic, The AP Ripped Off Obama
,----[ Quote ]
| I must admit that I tend to disagree with a significant percentage of
| Lichtman's conclusions on intellectual property, but unlike many copyright
| maximalists, I tend to believe he's much more intellectually honest on these
| issues. His positions don't seem to come from a "more is absolutely better
| because it makes me/my clients more money" position, but he honestly tends to
| believe that greater copyright leads to a greater net outcome, and tends to
| argue reasonably about it -- though, I believe some of that reasoning, and
| the assumptions that underpin it are faulty.
|
| [...]
|
| No, what's not fair is claiming that any of that is the AP's to own. None of
| it. Not a single part of it was. All of that -- the hope, the way he was
| looking, was simply there. What made him choose it was the look on Obama's
| face -- which is not Garcia's creative output, and thus cannot be covered by
| copyright. In fact, the most frustrating thing of all is that Cendali
| repeatedly claims that Fairey was ripping off Garcia (and the AP), but misses
| the obvious problem with that argument: which is that if her argument is
| correct, then the AP and Garcia also ripped off Obama, since it was his
| creativity in looking the way he did and making the facial expression he did.
| Once again, such externalities are apparently only acceptable when the AP
| benefits. But, Cendali seems to ignore that, and Lichtman lets her get off,
| noting that he basically agrees with her.
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1828265616.shtml
Is The BBC An AP Parasite?
,----[ Quote ]
| Anyway, not long after that, I saw that the BBC appears to have a very
| similar article, and it's quite clear that all they did was rewrite the AP's
| article. At one point, they do credit the AP, but the article is almost a
| direct paraphrase of the AP's. So does the AP start calling the BBC a
| parasite, too? Or does it finally realize that no one owns the news, and lots
| of publications often rewrite the news and have for ages?
`----
http://techdirt.com/articles/20090722/0126305618.shtml
Industry study claims strong copyrights fuel economic engine
,----[ Quote ]
| A report released by the International Intellectual Property Alliance shows
| that copyright-related industry has been booming in recent years. But a
| closer examination of the data shows that the numbers don't add up so easily.
`----
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/07/industry-study-claims-strong-copyrights-fuel-economic-engine.ars
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrOKqUACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4dwACfd34oll86i/IABPKWbLK+5nIS
PFsAn0Fq7pgpc3LYObVXVgBZL71MDqak
=uRPY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
