Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Government Tries to Get It with Free Software, Transparency

  • Subject: [News] Government Tries to Get It with Free Software, Transparency
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:14:23 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Law.Gov: America's Operating System, Open Source

,----[ Quote ]
| Public.Resource.Org is very pleased to announce 
| that we're going to be working with a 
| distinguished group of colleagues from across the 
| country to create a solid business plan, 
| technical specs, and enabling legislation for the 
| federal government to create Law.Gov. We envision 
| Law.Gov as a distributed, open source, 
| authenticated registry and repository of all 
| primary legal materials in the United States. 
| More details on the effort are available on our 
| Law.Gov page.
`----

http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/10/lawgov-americas-operating-syst.html

Rock the vote? Trust it first!

,----[ Quote ]
| Next week, a gathering of government officials, 
| Hollywood progressives, techno-geeks and Rock the 
| Vote officials will meet in the home of film 
| producer/activist Lawrence Bender to discuss 
| "open-source voting" and how to achieve 
| reliability and accuracy with digital vote 
| tallies.
`----

http://www.thisisbrandx.com/2009/10/rock-the-vote-trust-it-first.html


Recent:

Transparency against malpractic

,----[ Quote ]
| As a result of my new enthusiasm to 'get out more' I found myself listening
| to a detailed and balanced 'non-advocacy' presentation from a respected OSS
| Watch staffer.
|
| He explained patiently how open source licencing worked and how it differed
| from proprietary licences. But what he did say whilst looking for an everyday
| resonance to make his points accessible to a non-geek audience, and which
| really sharpened every-one's attention, was that proprietary software was
| built on secret code whereas open source software had transparent code.
|
| Proprietary software IS composed of secret code. You can't read it, you don't
| know what it does (other than what you can see it do), you don't know how it
| does it and you can't change it.
`----

http://www.siriusit.co.uk/myblog/secret-code-and-the-damage-it-does-to-our-society.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkrbvW8ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7JkgCdFJu4/SXW161VWHMuqaGztoqB
0VIAoJ36jBDwl7Qh38kibLL8yDeSwUuU
=Y8qB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index