-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Terry Porter on Saturday 07 Nov 2009 09:16 : \____
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:37:34 +0100, Erik Jan wrote:
>> Terry Porter had de volgende lumineuze gedachte op 07-11-09 06:31:
>>> An /Ubuntu upgrade/ is slightly harder than incredibly easy.
>>> That's *virtually* what theregister has said ....
>>>>> So I call FUD, because they first say it's hard, then they say it's
>>>>> easy all in the same article.
>>>> This author is a known Microsoft booster with am extensive track
>>>> record and a Microsoft-only podcast he's doing with Mary Jo Foley.
>>>> Watch how almost every complaint about 9.10 points to his article
>>> Yes, its obviously FUD to me, based on my experience installing U9.10
>>> on two completely different machines, both of which were incredibly
>> A few days ago I upgraded my Ubuntu installation. I got a notice that I
>> could upgrade online. I did this, left my machine and when I cam home a
>> few hours later, the upgrade to 9.10 was done. I cannot find anything
>> that is wrong. This is even easier than a clean install!! I do not know
>> what could be easier. I know of course that more often than not there
>> may be minor or sometimes even major problems after such an upgrade, but
>> my experience now is that the Ubuntu team did a VERY GOOD job.
>> Erik Jan
> Thanks for the update Erik, and of course I'm not surprised to hear that
> the reality of U9.10 is nothing like the current massive anti U9.10 FUD
> campaign is claiming.
Maybe start a little poll in COLA to see who had problems in 9.10 (except the trolls,
who are liars)?
~~ Best of wishes
Documentation is the castor oil of programming. Managers know it must
be good because the programmers hate it so much.
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 4088500k total, 417880k used, 3670620k free, 264040k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----