-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Chris Ahlstrom on Tuesday 17 Nov 2009 17:20 : \____
> JEDIDIAH pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> On 2009-11-16, Mr. Majestic <Majestic2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> <http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005nov05/11-15TechnicalComputingVisionPR.mspx>
>>>>
>>>> Our faculty tried it as the time as it was a massive fail. Microsoft gave
>>>> it away for free or something. What a fail.
>>>
>>> Does this moron know what clustered SQL servers are about running on Win
>>> 2k3 servers, Win 2k8 servers or Win 7 servers?
>
> Bwahahahaha.
>
>> ...that would be for something like basic failover and data federation.
>
> Exactly. Microsoft's original clustering implementation was (and is) a
> complete misnomer, a marketing lie. It is failover. In no way is it a way
> to distribute the computing load.
>
>> That has about as much to do with serious clustering as a bicycle has to
>> do with serious freight transport with trains or 18-wheelers.
>
> And even Microsoft failover doesn't behave as advertised. The notification
> for a resource recovery would come in and... you still had to wait a few
> seconds before you could actually access the resource.
3 letters: L S E.
:-)
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"I've tried to convince many vegetarian friends that chicken are just
fast-moving vegetables." -- Simon Cozens
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 2075800k total, 1660792k used, 415008k free, 12460k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAksDTfYACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6uGACfZrlj6kdf2wFneDU6FIW78RsZ
LBwAnj0MiK3WVKsCXcJVMwxac7ch0okd
=9t4d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
