-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Megabyte on Sunday 22 Nov 2009 16:39 : \____
> On 09-11-21 7:46 PM, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Inventec Smartbook almost makes me think Smartbooks have a shot
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Thereâs no question that PC makers and
>> | wireless carriers are getting ready to
>> | unveil a whole slew of low power smartbooks
>> | with ARM processors and Linux...
>> Qualcomm sees big bucks in China's smartbook market
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | It's almost as if Qualcomm's CEO Paul
>> | Jacobs took a deep breath and looked the
>> | vast expanse that is Mainland China and
>> | said to himself; 'There be money in them
>> | there hills...'. As well there should be.
>> | Qualcomm is arguably the world's biggest
>> | producer of ARM-based silicon, the very
>> | silicon that powers virtually every cell
>> | phone ever made. Today's statement however
>> | took some commentators by surprise as it
>> | was made not in the context of phones, but
>> | of smartbooks, miniature computers that are
>> | set to replace Netbooks as the next-big-
>> | thing in 2010.
>> | [...]
>> | Will Android or Google Chrome OS have a
>> | part to play? Of course. Will Apple be
>> | watching with interest? You bet. 'Tis an
>> | interesting view from here, has to be said.
> The more I read about smartbooks the more they seem like the convergence
> of Smartphones with Netbooks. An interesting concept but the ubiquitous
> access to WiFi or 3G service at affordable prices needs to come first.
> Where I'm located WiFi is available in some coffee shops, hotels and a
> handful of restaurants. 3G service is cost prohibitive in many
> respects, I always feel I have to do the minimum amount online when I am
> using it to keep the cost down. Battery life use to be a major inhibitor
> to mobile computing but that has been addressed on many of the latest
> Netbooks and some laptops. Now the hurdle seems to be affordable
> wireless connectivity. I pay around $40-$50 per month for ADSL\Cable
> access at 15 MB access with limits of upwards of 130 GB per month.
> Contrast that with 3G cellular data which costs $100 per month for lower
> speed but acceptable access speeds and a 5 GB data cap. 3G needs to
> become more affordable but will it because as it becomes more affordable
> the demand for it will be greater and can wireless providers support the
> increased infrastructure costs with lower fees?
At some stage (around 2006) Microsoft was thinking as seriously as Google
about doing wifi services. Later came the spectrum wars. There's a lot of
wiggling room with subsidies and lock-in, which is what they all have
in mind, IMHO.
~~ Best of wishes
This is why websites popular after 19100, such as My Space, appear to
have been designed on an etch-a sketch. -- Uncyclopedia
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 22.6%us, 5.0%sy, 0.1%ni, 70.6%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.4%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----