Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Theory That Windows Users Are Gullible is Probably Confirmed

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Theory That Windows Users Are Gullible is Probably Confirmed
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:38:19 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Are Microsoft Users More Gullible When It Comes To Online Advertising?

,----[ Quote ]
| When it cut the numbers by operating system, 
| Chitika a similar trend.  Windows users are 
| about twice as likely as Linux or Mac users to 
| click on ads. All of this data comes from one 
| advertising network, so Iâd say it is more 
| suggestive than scientific (Iâd love to know if 
| other ad network are seeing the same trends). 
| But it is a large sample.
`----

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/10/microsoft-users-gullible-advertising/

Many hideous things still come from Microsoft.


Related:

OpenDomain.org owner: Selfless FOSS helper or domain squatter?

,----[ Quote ]
| Johnson is a consultant and developer who uses Microsoft products to code. He
| says he wants to "break into the open source world," but doesn't have the
| skills. He says he decided to give to open source in his own way: by
| purchasing domain names and providing free use of them to worthy open source
| projects. Johnson says he is an "anti-squatter," purchasing domains for
| hundreds of dollars and protecting them from misuse. He asks nothing in
| return except an acknowledgment and a link to opendomain.org on every page of
| the sites he licenses.
|
| [...]
|
| Mullenweg, who had no comment for Linux.com, convinced Johnson to hand the
| domain over to him. "After I gave it to him, he sued me," Johnson says. "I
| spent a hell of a lot of money on that domain and $30,000 more on lawyers."
| Mullenweg refused to comment.
|
| Johnson admits he made a mistake with the WordPress affair. "He was
| completely right. He owned the idea of WordPress and I didn't understand that
| at the time. I think we could have worked it out better." Since that
| misunderstanding, it seems Johnson has changed his tack with regard to
| donating domain names to open source projects.
|
| [...]
|
| "I thought I was doing something good with Matt. All my advisors starting
| saying, 'Hey this is great,' so in the midst of that we bought drupal.com."
| The Drupal community reacted with disdain when it found out that Johnson had
| registered drupal.com. "Everybody in the community hated me," Johnson says."
|
| "They want to piggy-back on the great reputation of Drupal to get their link
| on high traffic, high page-rank sites," wrote a forum member at
| drupal.org. "And they want to do it under the guise of 'open.' What is so
| open about cybersquatting a domain, then 'benevolently' allowing the people
| who are busy making the domain valuable to use it..."
|
| Johnson says it took a bit of explaining. "When I talked to Dries Buytaert
| [Drupal's creator and original project leader] he was originally like, 'OK,
| what are you trying to do? OK, you're contributing in a different way, but
| you're still contributing." Johnson ended up transferring ownership of
| drupal.com to Buytaert, and the domain sits unused, though Buytaert commented
| in a press release that he was "very grateful" for the contribution.
`----

http://www.linux.com/feature/140576
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksjxvsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6yLACgk3lR+pJGp8twSDDmnIQm8uRQ
qkMAn3GiWJO/H2e6rq+EZfux1gxtubUv
=lP8f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index