Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Mobility: the melting foss-pot for the teens

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Mark Kent on Saturday 02 Jan 2010 02:26 : \____

> 
> 
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>
>>
>>
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Friday 01 Jan 2010 14:36 : \____
>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 31 Dec 2009 23:58 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> Okay, the screen is too small for detailed graphical work, and Microsoft
>>>>> will surely roll-out a version of office as quickly as possible with a
>>>>> new file format which only Microsoft can read, which will make life
>>>>> painful for all Blackberry, iPhone and Android users
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft already uses Silver Lie [sic] to cause disruption to such
>>>> devices.
>>>>
>>> 
>>> It's already causing damage, for example, Murdoch's empire has the
>>> rights to cricket TV broadcasting now, so in order to watch cricket, you
>>> either have to buy Sky TV (why would you?) or do pay per view on
>>> t'internet, but you need a silverlight player to do that.
>>> 
>>> Essentially, Murdoch has locked out linux users from online cricket.
>>> One would think that Ofcom might have a view on this, but time will
>>> tell.
>>> 
>>> Similar debate has been ongoing with the HD broadcasting even by the
>>> BBC, as there was talk of encrypting aspects of that, although I'm not
>>> sure which.  The EPG still seems to be a problem on "freesat", too.
>>
>> Murdoch had meetings with Microsoft recently. They plotted an attack on
>> Google.
> 
> It ought to be a surprise, but it's not, really.  That Bill Gates and
> Rupert Murdoch could combine to continue to extend their respective
> monopolies - Murdoch has 100% of satellite pay TV in the UK, Bill Gates
> has a global monopoly in consumer operating systems and business office
> software.
> 
> Note here that the HMG definition of a monopoly is >=50% of a market,
> and both Murdoch and Gates are way ahead of 50% respectively.
> 
> A slight side issue - someone suggested here, a couple of years ago,
> that having a monopoly as < 100% didn't make logical sense;  this is a
> naive position, since it would mean that just one person, somewhere, not
> running Windows, would mean that MS didn't have a monopoly which they
> were busy abusing...

Bill Gates used Firefox, so...

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes


perl -le '$b=1; print $a+=$b while print $b+=$a'
http://Schestowitz.com  |  GNU is Not UNIX  |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy      pts/0        :0               Sat Jan  2 01:35   still logged in   
      http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAks/6ogACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4XcgCfa4XXwApGK/rtDLJiGry4Uw7S
EdQAnihRgjCHUmlow5V2L9pV4mozroWj
=kRbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index