-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
PGP Corporation Announces New Data Protection Solutions For Mac And Linux Enterprise Users
,----[ Quote ]
| PGP Corporation, a global leader in
| enterprise data protection, today announced
| availability of the latest version of PGP
| Desktop. This new release extends PGP's
| leadership position in enterprise data
| protection and enables client convenience
| and compliance across all of the major
| desktop operating systems environments --
| Windows, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Linux and Red Hat
| Linux. In addition to allowing disk
| encryption across mixed environments, PGP
| Desktop for Mac now also supports Boot Camp,
| so users can have complete protection for
| machines running dual Mac OS X and Windows
| environments.
`----
http://www.darkreading.com/insiderthreat/security/encryption/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222301689
Related:
Animal Rights Activists Forced to Hand Over Encryption Keys
,----[ Quote ]
| If you remember, this was sold to the public as essential for fighting
| terrorism. It's already being misused.
`----
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/animal_rights_a.html
Why proprietary code is bad for security
,----[ Quote ]
| Tho Skype is using an encrypted protocol, itâs still their own, non-disclosed
| code and property. So we donât know what it contains.
|
| [...]
|
| Itâs time to stop accepting that we are the bad guys, and to stop consuming
| things we just donât understand (and cannot, because they are proprietary,
| closed-source systems).
|
| Say no to companies, or even governments who treat you like this. Start using
| open sourced products and protocols wherever you can. Even if you could
| still never understand the code used in these systems, there are still lots
| of people who can, and who will examine it. The magic word here is âpeer
| reviewâ - your friend or buddy or neighbour may be able to understand all
| that, and to help. No, not with Skype or Windows or any black box from Cisco.
`----
http://wolfgang.lonien.de/?p=394
Did NSA Put a Secret Backdoor in New Encryption Standard?
,----[ Quote ]
| Which is why you should worry about a new random-number standard that
| includes an algorithm that is slow, badly designed and just might contain a
| backdoor for the National Security Agency.
`----
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2007/11/securitymatters_1115
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAktayvQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6+ywCeJkwaB5IrZmEUbfPd/7GfFt1B
YgwAn3oWMc2JKrWkUWmrhWs6CaUP0BGf
=4xlx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|