Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] BBC Enters the Dark Side and Punished Free Software Using DRM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Mark Kent on Thursday 28 Jan 2010 15:56 : \____

> 
> 
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>
>>
>>
>> ____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 26 Jan 2010 14:27 : \____
>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>
>>>> ____/ Mark Kent on Monday 25 Jan 2010 16:33 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BBC given go-ahead for Freeview HD copy-protection
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>| The BBC has been granted provisional approval
>>>>>>| for the BBC to introduce copy protection for
>>>>>>| content on the Freeview HD platform.
>>>>>>| 
>>>>>>| With Freeview HD closing in on a commercial
>>>>>>| launch, focus has continued on what level of
>>>>>>| copy protection should be put in.
>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.techradar.com/news/television/hdtv/bbc-given-go-ahead-for-freeview-hd-
>>>> copy-protection-665556
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> One suspects that some aspects of the BBC's charter are being broken
>>>>> here.  Personally, I'd rather they didn't carry any HD than do this,
>>>>> which is as wrong as wrong can be.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can we start a campaign to stop HD on freeview?  Or at least, stop
>>>>> corrupted HD on freeview?
>>>>
>>>> I think they work on some workaround for FOSS, but I can't see it
>>>> happening. And they talk about "IPR" when asked about it (I saw it earlier,
>>>> can't recall where).
>>>>
>>> 
>>> IPR is a catch-all which is used as a shield against legitimate inquiry.
>>> 
>>> I think we should push, then, for the Beeb to avoid transmitting any
>>> "HD" which isn't theirs to transmit.  I suspect that HD will go the same
>>> way as most of the "developments", like DVDs being interactive, scene
>>> selection and so on, or anyone caring about picture quality.
>>> 
>>> Some of these things will happen in the end, but like 3G, probably not
>>> in any way which results in increased revenue for anyone.
>>
>> What they meant in this context, IIRC, is that people cannot store the stuff
>> locally or share it in any way. They haven't heard of screen grabbers at the
>> Beeb, I guess.
>>
>> "Everybody is connected to everybody else, all data that can be shared will
>> be shared will be shared: get used to it."
>>
> 
> I appreciate the intention, but I think it's just daft.  Why shouldn't
> people store the stuff locally?  Video recorders for time-shifting have
> been in use for 30-odd years in a domestic setting, in fact, probably
> more like 40-odd years if you go back to the Philips N1500 series.
> 
> I make constant and consistent use of my mythtv box, if I didn't have
> it, I'd not see most things I like to, as most things I like are not
> actually being broadcast when I want them.  Often I down-code them to
> watch on my Nokia N800, Acer AA1 or HTC Android phone.  The AA1 runs the
> myth client well even over wireless, but when I'm somewhere else...
> 
> What gets missed here is that the bandwidth of broadcast networks dwarfs
> internet, adsl, even fibre to the premises, so the smartest thing a user
> can do is secure a myth box, loads of hard drives, and programme it to
> record what you're interested in, which can then be watched at leisure.
> 
> Some people even come around to my house and watch things with me,
> too...

Broadcasters -- unlike ISPs (bandwidth) -- like the idea of remote viewing because it enables
them to "Refine" targeted ads (read: spying) and denial of access to 'unhealthy',
'illegal', or unpaid 'content' ("pay us again for the same thing!").

It basically keeps control in the company's hands even while/after you watch the thing.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

Previously-unsurpassed exposure makes carnation-faced men
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 140 total,   1 running, 139 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktiarMACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5gcACgr7M/dhhWHTc79c3vfylU+QG6
kAQAnRkSI2qINXRiHnZIoI63359kaR93
=RT/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index