Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Software Patents Disliked by Non-Lawyers, Bilski Case Still on

  • Subject: [News] Software Patents Disliked by Non-Lawyers, Bilski Case Still on
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:04:52 +0000
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Software patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Iâve considered the arguments by Stallman, 
| John Gruber, and Tim Bray on software 
| patents, and I side with Stallman in that 
| software patents are inherently problematic 
| and are a net loss for society.
| 
| The major difference in their arguments is 
| that, while all three mention the realities 
| and dysfunctions of the patent system, 
| Stallman focuses strongly on the difference 
| between what itâs intended to do and what 
| actually happens. He also illustrates the 
| reality of trying to develop any nontrivial 
| software in a patent-filled landscape.
| 
| [...]
| 
| The lesson learned in this case is that 
| although a claim may not explicitly and 
| positively recite a structural element, the 
| claim may require a specific structure to 
| perform the steps of the claim. If that 
| structure satisfies the machine prong of the 
| machine-or-transformation test, an 
| Examiner's 35 U.S.C. Â101 non-statutory 
| subject matter rejection may be reversed 
| under Bilski.
`----

http://www.marco.org/430351101

Today: U.S. Patent Office Reverses Â35 U.S.C. 101 Non-Statutory Subject Matter Rejection under Bilski 

,----[ Quote ]
| In one of its last decisions of today, the 
| Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 
| (BPAI) reversed a Patent Examiner's 35 
| U.S.C. Â101 non-statutory subject matter 
| rejection of a key Invatron Systems 
| invention. As a Miami Patent Attorney, this 
| case was interesting because I haven't seen 
| any BPAI decisions regarding 35 U.S.C. Â101, 
| much less a decision that invokes Bilski, in 
| a while.
| 
| At issue was an Invatron Systems claim 
| pertaining to a scale for weighing items, 
| wherein the scale included a computer that 
| performed a series of steps, such as 
| providing a coupon. The Examiner found the 
| claims recite a method of purely mental 
| steps, not tied to another statutory class. 
| The Appellants contended the claimed method 
| recites steps including providing a coupon 
| to the customer and that these steps cannot 
| be performed purely mentally since there is 
| no way to provide a coupon without the 
| coupon being physically inputted into the 
| weigh station display.
`----

http://www.floridapatentlawyerblog.com/2010/03/today-us-patent-office-reverse.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuWASQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo724gCfacfwX+KDIJYgp5car6GUepnU
ar0AniHp5MellwU6Sg3OgLHUpOM9G6rR
=tYUg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index