Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Strong New Criticisms of Patents and Information as 'Property'

  • Subject: [News] Strong New Criticisms of Patents and Information as 'Property'
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:22:13 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.3.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rather Than Considering Information 'Property,' What About
Looking At Productive vs. Destructive Uses?

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100324/1059308695.shtml

Is Intellectual Property A Violation Of Real Property?

http://techdirt.com/articles/20091116/1339346953.shtml

Modern Day Protectionism

,----[ Quote ]
| The consumer entertainment industry 
| lobbyists lie. They lie over, and over, and 
| over. They lie to the media, they lie to the 
| politicians, they lie to you. The lies in 
| question are rarely looked upon critically 
| by the media or the politicians, only by 
| grassroots opposition. The main lies 
| involved are all variations on the same 
| theme; copying equals theft. That is to say, 
| if you copy a piece of data â be it a 
| software program, a song, a movie, a book, 
| that makes you a thief. You're depriving the 
| producer of that work of money which they 
| supposedly have a right to.
| 
| I don't know, maybe I wasn't "educated" well 
| enough in government schools, but no matter 
| how I twist and turn my logic, I still fail 
| to see how this even remotely makes sense. 
| If I walk into a store and leave with a 
| jacket for which I have not paid then I have 
| deprived the store's owner of his or her 
| justly acquired, tangible property. They 
| have one less jacket. They are directly 
| harmed by my action.
| 
| [...]
| 
| For an extended discourse and refutation of 
| the other ones, as well as a more in-depth 
| take on copyright, I recommend to the reader 
| Stephan Kinsella's brilliant essay Against 
| Intellectual Property.
`----

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/krehic1.1.1.html

What If The Very Theory That Underlies Why We Need Patents Is Wrong?

,----[ Quote ]
| But, of course, patents are designed to make 
| that sort of thing more difficult, because 
| it assumes that the initial act of invention 
| is the key point, rather than all the 
| incremental innovations built on top of it 
| that all parties can benefit from. In fact, 
| the report points to numerous studies that 
| show, when given the chance, many companies 
| freely share their ideas with others, 
| recognizing the direct benefit they get. 
| This flies in the face of (unsubstantiated) 
| claims by patent system supporters that the 
| patent system is needed to disclose and 
| share inventions. In fact, the evidence 
| suggests that in many cases, firms will 
| willingly share that information anyway (for 
| a variety of reasons detailed in the report) 
| without requiring the "prize" of a monopoly 
| right to do so. 
`----

http://techdirt.com/articles/20100107/0517167656.shtml

Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502864
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvHn6UACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4x1QCfa9iKXFjphSYe5pKAXcoIku9d
dUMAnis2ZQsrq5yF59+nuuF4pIeTE9Ln
=sa0e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index