-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Red Hat Prevails in Federal District Court
http://investors.redhat.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=465534
Red Hat Prevails Against Patent Troll Acacia
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/05/01/1331256/Red-Hat-Prevails-Against-Patent-Troll-Acacia
User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
http://www.google.com/patents?id=3tUkAAAAEBAJ&dq=5,072,412
Red Hat & Novell Beat IP Innovation and in Marshall, Texas, too - Updated
,----[ Quote ]
| Say, that's what SCO wanted, and Microsoft.
| Everyone wants to use IP bogo lawsuits to
| get money from Linux, it seems.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100430223358785
Red Hat, Novell win verdict in Linux patent infringement case
,----[ Quote ]
| Now that the SCO and IP Innovation cases are
| disposed of, it anyone else want to take on
| Linux?
`----
http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6388
SCO Says Jury Didn't Really Mean What It Said... And Judge Should Order Novell To Hand SCO Unix Copyrights
http://techdirt.com/articles/20100430/0204269253.shtml
The Real Legal Argument Revealed (in a comic strip)
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100429121720753
Novell v. Vigilant Insurance
,----[ Quote ]
| Well, this is fascinating. Here's an order
| from Judge Ted Stewart in a dispute between
| Novell and its insurer, Vigilant Insurance
| Company. Novell tried to get them to pay for
| the SCO v. Novell litigation back in 2004
| and they refused, so Novell sued last May.
| They were seeking to have at least some of
| their expense to defend from SCO's attacks
| covered by the insurer, but Judge Stewart
| just ruled on summary judgment [PDF] that
| slander of title isn't included in the
| policy and SCO's initial complaint was for
| slander of title only, so Vigilant doesn't
| have to pay.
|
| [...]
|
| You know what is sort of odd? This order was
| signed on April 27. The jury in SCO v.
| Novell ruled that SCO doesn't own the
| copyrights in dispute on March 30, 2010. Yet
| Judge Stewart never mentions that.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100430103811766
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkve2EsACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5zfgCffRe6y1Br5RUIhv/NmHncWT8x
I5IAnRaI+J69uyTR7Thg4kalSB2ScaA5
=3mqw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
