Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Linux (Kernel Space) 2.6.34-rc6, 2.6.32.12, and 2.6.33.3 Released; Linux Compared to E. Coli

  • Subject: [News] Linux (Kernel Space) 2.6.34-rc6, 2.6.32.12, and 2.6.33.3 Released; Linux Compared to E. Coli
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 23:31:54 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stable kernels 2.6.32.12 and 2.6.33.3

,----[ Quote ]
| The 2.6.32.12 and 2.6.33.3 stable kernel 
| updates are out.
`----

http://lwn.net/Articles/384697/rss

Linux 2.6.34-rc6 Kernel Released

,----[ Quote ]
| The complete change-log for the Linux 
| 2.6.34-rc6 kernel can be read at 
| Kernel.org.
`----

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODIwMg

Linux Versus E. coli

,----[ Quote ]
| Both Linux and E. coli are organized into 
| hierarchies. But their hierarchies have 
| different shapes. E. coliâs genome is 
| dominated by workhorses. Middle-managers 
| and master regulators make up less than 5% 
| of the total number of genes. In Linux, by 
| contrast, over 80% of the functions are in 
| the upper echelons. Each workhorse in Linux 
| is controlled to many middle managers. In 
| E. coli, on the other hand, each workhorse 
| gene is typically controlled either by a 
| few genes or just one. And so in E. coli 
| itâs the higher levels where genes have the 
| most links, not the workhorses.
`----

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/05/03/linux-versus-e-coli/

Phenom II X6 Performance Under Linux Below Expectations

,----[ Quote ]
| In testing the Phenom II X6, Linux Magazine 
| noticed that AMDs new processor doesn't 
| have the full performance under the current 
| Linux kernel. A bug in Linux power 
| management throws a wrench into the six-
| core processing.
`----

http://www.ubuntu-user.com/Online/News/Phenom-II-X6-Performance-Under-Linux-Below-Expectations

Systemd presented as SysV-Init and Upstart alternative 

,----[ Quote ]
| The main developer of Upstart, Scott James 
| Remnant, commented on Systemd shortly after 
| it was presented in his own blog. Remnant 
| admits that Upstart is by no means perfect 
| and that he cannot argue with the points of 
| criticism that Poettering brings up. But 
| now that Ubuntu 10.04 has been released, he 
| says he plans to spend more time on Upstart 
| and focus on a number of the criticised 
| elements. He adds that it is too early to 
| tell which of the two approaches will be 
| better in the long term.
`----

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Systemd-presented-as-SysV-Init-and-Upstart-alternative-991875.html

A Look at minit

http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/look-minit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvgoFoACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6CkQCgpeIMWNoatZLQzfRIoV68GrUF
RB8An1X66dGNtCRbo7CPunJFWrixTiQL
=EpL3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index