Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Development With Proprietary Software is Doing Damage GUIs Development

  • Subject: [News] Development With Proprietary Software is Doing Damage GUIs Development
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 17:42:10 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Closed source software hurts GUI development

,----[ Quote ]
| AS OPERATING SYSTEMS increasingly become 
| visual feasts, those who want to create 
| useful interaction enhancements are having 
| to bend over backwards thanks to closed 
| source software in order to bring 
| innovation to the user's environment.
| 
| Two bright young men from the University of 
| Washington recently presented Prefab, a 
| technology which they say will facilitate 
| the implementation of "advanced behaviours 
| in graphical interfaces". That in itself 
| isn't particularly new but the route Prefab 
| takes to implement well documented 
| graphical user interface (GUI) techniques 
| are a clear example of the lengths 
| engineers have to go to circumnavigate the 
| limitations posed by closed source 
| software.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/feature/1603492/closed-source-software-hurts-gui-development

Too Many Forges, Too Little Time

,----[ Quote ]
| Those days are long over, and I wonder if 
| that's a good thing. SourceForge, for all 
| its flaws (and it had plenty), set some 
| expectations for projects that other 
| services do not. For example, SourceForge 
| provides Web hosting, mailing lists, bug 
| trackers, and most of the tools that 
| projects need to grow and succeed. In 
| short, not just the development tools, but 
| also the community tools needed to discuss 
| and promote the projects. For many 
| projects, that set an expectation of using 
| those tools.
`----

http://ostatic.com/blog/too-many-forges-too-little-time


Recent:

New Application Could Make All Software 'open Source'

,----[ Quote ]
| Imagine controlling Apple iTunes from
| inside Microsoft Word without having to
| switch applications. That could be
| possible, according to researchers at the
| University of Washington who are working on
| a project that could essentially make any
| proprietary software open source.
`----

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/193068/new_application_could_make_all_software_open_source.html


Prefab system 'makes all software open source'

,----[ Quote ]
| A University of Washington team has
| developed a system it says makes all
| software effectively open source, allowing
| users to add custom features to any
| program.
|
| "Microsoft and Apple aren't going to open
| up all their stuff. But they all create
| programs that put pixels on the screen. And
| if we can modify those pixels, then we can
| change the program's apparent behavior,"
| said James Fogarty, a UW assistant
| professor of computer science and
| engineering.
`----

http://www.tgdaily.com/software-features/49184-prefab-system-makes-all-software-open-source


Is Prefab legal?

http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=6170


GNU/Linux and freedom: non-free software hidden in your GNU/Linux distribution

,----[ Quote ]
| Most people with an interest in software
| freedom will turn to GNU/Linux as their
| operating system of choice. Few realize
| however, that the vast majority of
| GNU/Linux distros are not entirely free.
| Imagine migrating away from Windows, only
| to find that by installing GNU/Linux you
| are accepting a restrictive Microsoft
| license!
|
| Many distros promote the use of proprietary
| software, knowingly show incorrect
| licenses, and attempt to hide the problem
| under the guise of an âoption of freedomâ.
| When the majority of developers of a
| collection of software donât care about
| freedom, neither will their users. Non-free
| distros make almost no attempts to inform
| their userbases of the importance of
| freedom, even though they wouldnât exist
| without it. I will discuss how the option
| of freedom is an unacceptable solution, and
| propose some real fixes.
|
| The problem
|
| Iâve been using GNU/Linux for over 5 years,
| but Iâve only recently discovered just how
| much non-free software my distro contains.
| I decided to search through my system and
| remove everything that was non-free, and
| there was quite a lot that I removed.
`----

http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/columns/gnu_linux_and_freedom_nonfree_software_hidden_in_your_linux_distribution


10 Windows applications that should be ported to Linux

,----[ Quote ]
| I canât tell you how many emails, phone
| calls, IMs, and Facebook messages Iâve gotten
| that asked when or if an application would be
| ported from Windows to Linux. Or how many
| times Iâve heard someone say, âI would use
| Linux, if X were ported to it!â So I decided
| to put these wishes to good use and list the
| top applications that should be ported to
| Linux. Some could be possible. Some are not
| (for whatever reason), which is a shame
| because the ânot possibleâ tends to keep
| people from adopting Linux.
`----

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1412
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkvllGIACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5f5gCfRFPYrbdNqm8G2vynDMuYIqsh
SEEAn1B9cyM/OUnz+dE/Xr5+PwaqNQAw
=YzDa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index