-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Will USPTO use Section 112 more often in rejections of software patents claims?
,----[ Quote ]
| USPTO Director David Kappos recently
| commented on the March 22, 2010 Federal
| Circuit en banc decision Ariad
| Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly and concluded
| that the written description requirement
| remains alive and well and is an essential
| âbackstopâ against overclaiming. In the
| case, the Federal Circuit held that
| Section 112 of the Patent Act has a
| written description requirement that is
| separate and apart from the enablement
| requirement.
`----
http://www.visaepatentes.com/2010/05/uspto-director-david-kappos-recently.html
i4i clears hurdle in patent battle
,----[ Quote ]
| Toronto-based i4i said yesterday that the
| U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has
| confirmed the validity of its software patent
| after Microsoft had asked that it be
| reviewed.
`----
http://www.thespec.com/News/Business/article/767846
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvti5cACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5ZAgCeMHe3o9+iWMVLA6ZyX8C0qj1o
5egAoKDnSY457u3EzqN7wUhZVtnUHEVn
=ecUN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
