-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Linux = Windows anti-virus? Not!
,----[ Quote ]
| Recently, I've come across a few
| interesting, yet misleading articles
| debating the pros and cons, mostly pros, of
| using this or that Linux distribution as
| the ultimate solution to Windows security
| problems, including frequent malware
| infections and reinfections and other
| related issues. While the overall
| conclusion might be correct, the specific
| analogies used to prove the point and bring
| you to said conclusion are most erroneous.
`----
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/linux-security-anti-virus.html
[It's GNU/Linux]
http://imgur.com/ozK9b
Recent:
Security: FOSS/CSS Updates - Are They Worth Anything?
,----[ Quote ]
| It appears from my experience that the
| majority of non-technical end-users who
| end up with infected systems fall into the
| first category. The second category is a
| smaller group that have just been lucky to
| not yet have an infected PC. These two
| categories of users are almost all
| Microsoft operating system users. The
| latter two categories are the small group
| of users that are more technical and/or
| security conscious. The more security
| conscious but non-technical are usually
| those who have had to deal with a prior PC
| infection. The latter two categories
| rarely or never see an infection. The Open
| Source community of Linux users is
| generally more technical at this point and
| thus more likely to take updates
| seriously.
`----
http://blog.eracc.com/2010/05/18/security-fosscss-updates-are-they-worth-anything/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwCIjEACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5JOwCdEPtt7zWzsEXfooCn99hr2+To
AMYAnAw5WO+5SNOmkcr4RkWBQh1tOs2/
=TAZQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
