Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Unrest and Apathy Towards Patents is Noted

  • Subject: [News] Unrest and Apathy Towards Patents is Noted
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:22:36 +0100
  • Followup-to: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/4.4.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Patents seen as low priority for software firms

,----[ Quote ]
| Biotech, medical device and hardware 
| startups almost always use patents to 
| protect their prospects, but young software 
| companies generally do not, according to the 
| first quantitative study of how small firms 
| use intellectual property protections.
`----

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/06/22/BU6J1E37U0.DTL

Human Genome Project leader warns against attempts to patent genes

,----[ Quote ]
| Human genetic information must be kept in 
| the public domain to allow researchers to 
| analyse it and to give members of the public 
| fair access to medical treatments, the Nobel 
| prizewinning scientist who led the British 
| contribution to the Human Genome Project 
| said today.
| 
| Speaking at a briefing at the Science Museum 
| in London to mark the 10th anniversary of 
| the first draft of the human genome, 
| biologist John Sulston said scientists and 
| lawmakers must resist attempts by 
| corporations and individuals to patent human 
| genes.
| 
| In the US, for example, it costs a woman 
| between $3,000 and $4,000 to be tested for 
| familial breast cancer because a corporation 
| owns the patent for the two genes involved. 
| "The fact of the matter is that many human 
| genes have patent rights on them and this is 
| going to get in the way of treatment unless 
| you have a lot of money," said Sulston. "And 
| it's going to get in the way of research."
`----

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2010/jun/24/human-genome-project-patent-genes


Recent:

United States: Ground-breaking Federal District Court Ruling on Gene Patents

,----[ Quote ]
| Editor: Do you see any of your larger clients
| selling off some of their patent portfolios?
|
| Camacho: I see very few of my clients selling
| off patent assets except in connection with
| the sale of a portion of the business, which
| will typically include the portion of the
| patent portfolio to which it pertained. More
| often, my clients are finding strategic
| partnerships in which they can monetize their
| patent portfolio by licensing the technology
| in markets that are ancillary or orthogonal to
| the client's primary market - i.e., they don't
| want to license the technology to a
| competitor. However, when a client has a large
| number of overlapping patents on a particular
| product and the value of pushing through
| incremental advances on that particular
| product is marginal at best, I do see clients
| choosing to spend less of their IP budget on
| getting additional patent coverage.
`----

http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/article.asp?articleid=101018


Cancer gene patent faces legal challenge

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/cancer-gene-patent-faces-legal-challenge-20100608-xriy.html


Biotech industry warns about legal challenge

,----[ Quote ]
| ELEANOR HALL: Australia's biotechnology
| industry is warning that the court challenge
| being launched today against the patenting of
| human genetic material could kill off
| investment in the industry.
|
| Lawyers have begun legal action against four
| biotechnology companies, which co-own the
| patent to the breast cancer gene.
|
| They say companies shouldn't have the right
| to commercialise the human body.
|
| But representatives of the biotechnology
| industry say the landmark legal case could
| stifle innovation and investment in important
| medical research.
`----

http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s2921333.htm


Think Gene Patents Are Controversial Now? Just Wait

,----[ Quote ]
| Of course, the $1,000 genome is likely
| years away, and those who favor exclusive
| patents on diagnostics say theyâre
| necessary for companies to make their money
| back on research and development.
|
| But exclusive patents may already be
| keeping some patients in the dark, the WSJ
| article says. It describes a new method of
| genetic testing called chromosomal
| microarrays that can pick up chromosomal
| abnormalities in the genome. Whatâs a
| doctor to do if that kind of analysis
| encompasses a gene thatâs already patented
| â tell the patient or stick to the letter
| of the law?
`----

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/04/14/think-gene-patents-are-controversial-now-just-wait/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwku6wACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4VzACfS2KBeFIeQXDNzgWx4IPApGC8
tE4AnjhY9pgjh/4RXE3PgxO//Dj02qo4
=oSR4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index