Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [horde] Filters "(NOT)CONTAINS" Versus "IS"

  • To: horde@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [horde] Filters "(NOT)CONTAINS" Versus "IS"
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:32:50 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:32:59 +0100
  • Envelope-to: s@schestowitz.com
  • In-reply-to: <20060822001313.g2owji700soccc08@neo.wg.de>
  • References: <20060821074240.1rtllzm8z7s4wcc8@banana.catalyst2.com> <20060822001313.g2owji700soccc08@neo.wg.de>
  • User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.1)
___/ On Mon 21 Aug 2006 23:13:13 BST, [ Jan Schneider ] wrote : \___

Zitat von Roy Schestowitz <r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi all,

I have a question to ask about filters. Ever since a recent upgrade of Horde, I have been faced with a problem. In the past I had a filter that said if <FIELD> "IS" <STRING> then <ACTION>

However, conditions appear to have changed. I no longer have the "IS" (exact match) condition. There is only "CONTAINS" and "DOES NOT CONTAIN" contain. As a result, I am forced to wade through a lot of spam. Is there any trick for specifying that a field should be an exact match? In this case, I wish to move messages sent to r@DOMAIN, but the filters will also catch somethingr@DOMAIN (notice the "r" at the end).

Which Ingo version and which backend do you use?

Jan.

Hi Jan,

Judging by the message headers, it's version 4.1.1 of Horde. I don't know what version of Ingo, I'm afraid. It's a Red Hat server on which I have just user's privileges.

Many thanks,

Roy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index