----- "Gunnar Wolf" <gwolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I had not yet read Ana's mail before sending this one. But I stand by
> what I said.
>
> Yes, I was part of the talks team. But yes, I was too entangled in
> other stuff to frankly look at all of the ad-hoc scheduling stuff.
>
> But yes, we as a team accepted his talk — Even as an ad-hoc, with all
> of the specifics Ana mentioned.
>
> OK, it was not us (Talks Team) who reached out to Linus. But we
> accepted his session (knowing who he was, knowing he was not a
> DebConf
> attendee and that he comes from a very different background and
> mindset).
>
> So, even if the CoC was sent to him... At least I would not have
> expected him to read and obey it. Still, I didn't raise any points
> about the fact.
You guys basically lit some dynamite and then asked it to apologize
for exploding... because you handed it a note saying "please don't
explode".
(Noting, of course, that this is my opinion and intended only in a
constructive manner that helps all of us grow as people. Profuse
apologies to anyone who construes this as ego-wrecking sarcasm. I
assure you that such a perception is entirely due to the inability
of email messages to clearly carry emotional subtext and innuendo.)
--
Please respect the privacy of this mailing list. Some posts may be declassified
3 years after posting as per http://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002
Archive: file://master.debian.org/~debian/archive/debian-private/
To UNSUBSCRIBE, use the web form at <http://db.debian.org/>.
|
|
