On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:46:34PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:18:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Even with Linus, I'm sure that the call for deciding not to invite him to
> > further Debian events is based on the long-term pattern of behavior, not
> > this one incident. And even among people who find his position generally
> > unacceptable, you'll notice that there isn't widespread support for that
> > action here. (I don't agree with it in this case, for instance.)
>
> And I think this is wrong. If you want to ban him for his behavior in
> a Debian controlled space, that's fine. But for Debian to impose its
> Norms on other projects by saying that people who behave in a certain
> way when interacting in those communities which are outside of
> Debian's is wrong.
How you went from Russ' point about Debian right "not to invite him" and
Debian "impose its Norms on other projects" is beyond me. Surely at
Debian events it is Debian norms that matter rather than other
project ones?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@xxxxxxxxxx . . . . o . . . o . o
Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|
|
