Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

  • Subject: Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <roy-at-schestowitz-dot-com@use-address-before-at.com>
  • Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 06:18:48 +0100
  • Followup-to: sci.physics.relativity
  • Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, alt.atheism, uk.philosophy.atheism, alt.philosophy, alt.religion.christian
  • References: <%t3Zc.213728$8_6.141480@attbi_s04> <Tvqdnf7uoIMejdTcRVn-sg@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409162332.12429951@posting.google.com> <a6mdnQxbPvCCadfcRVn-qw@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409180445.117180a9@posting.google.com> <IqWdnVF4A9JHkNDcRVn-jQ@comcast.com> <cik793$k5d$07$1@news.t-online.com> <lvOdna7i37LE5dPcRVn-uw@comcast.com> <cinmra$27i$01$1@news.t-online.com> <NKSdnfAMD_IrU9LcRVn-tg@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409210222.354dc16f@posting.google.com> <BtednVwVG9_Xzc3cRVn-iQ@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409290742.2da8b402@posting.google.com> <FY-dnSF6DZiayMbcRVn-sw@comcast.com> <cjhc9e$ihn$04$2@news.t-online.com> <pZ-dnRqJCu720MHcRVn-jg@comcast.com> <cjhpu0$8am$04$1@news.t-online.com> <SpidnXmS6NPid8HcRVn-uQ@comcast.com> <timberwoof-9677FA.11260501102004@typhoon.sonic.net> <ZYGdnQJxEK6VtsPcRVn-sg@comcast.com> <4K6dnUkwAIq-qcPcRVn-tA@comcast.com> <10lsjapebp7htc9@corp.supernews.com> <CbmdncJiVJPh4cLcRVn-sQ@comcast.com>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
George Hammond wrote:

> ...
> What this means is that there is a subconscious mental activity
> influencing and guiding us that we are barely able to notice...
> and this is called "God" (all this is proved experimentally
> to 2 decimal point accuracy, Hammond 2003, Noetic Journal).
>    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ...
>
> Now, it is manifest that all of human activity is motivated
> towards increasing our growth to "full growth" (becoming God in
> the flesh) 

I need not say anything more. George's words above prove him to be a
lunatic.

> Because of this a "DIVINE SELECTION" term must be added to
> Darwins's "NATURAL SELECTION"...

Keep Darwin out of this please.

> the bottom line is that persuing an advanced theory
> of Intelligent Design by using Statistics and Information Theory
> as Bill Dembski is doing could possibly (some day) yield a rigorous
> scientific proof of God. 

You admit that there is no (rigorous) proof of SPoG yet. Finally! George is
giving up.

Roy

-- 
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index