Roy Schestowitz wrote:
After getting some experience with the GIMP, I realised that in terms of
results, I was able to get better-looking stuff in significantly less time.
The GUI is not graceful, fair enough, and it's Open Source, but if a rusty
bulldozer takes a house down more quickly than a silver sledgehammer, why
not go for the bulldozer?
If I had spent more time with Photoshop in my grown-up years, maybe my
opinion would differ.
I use Photoshop for a lot more than making images for the web. GIMP
cannot touch it for professional digital imaging, photo restoration, not
to mention (and I may be wrong as I have not checked recently) I don't
believe GIMP can even handle RAW (RAW is format professional Digital
Cameras store images. As soon as you convert RAW to any other format
like tiff or jpg on your smart card, you lose something.)
For the web, professional or not, and other, non professional, imaging
needs, GIMP does everything someone would need.
--
-=tn=-
|
|
