__/ [Peter Hayes] on Thursday 08 December 2005 13:43 \__
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> __/ [Rick] on Sunday 04 December 2005 03:42 \__
>>
>> > On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:11:14 -0800, John Bailo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Malware Magnet wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> "There can be no assurance software developers will continue to
>> >>> develop software for Mac OS X, the Company's operating system, on a
>> >>> timely basis or at all," the firm said.
>> >>
>> >> Translation:
>> >>
>> >> "Did you think we were still a computer company? No, we sell portable
>> >> transistor radios..."
>> >
>> > ... really? what are they called?
>>
>> ByePod.
>>
>> Apple might sooner or later lose avid users due to Linux. Having enabled
>> KDE translucency and shadow casting yesterday, I am convinced that the
>> glitter of Mac OS X will not keep it alive for long.
>>
>> Take a glimpse...
>>
>> http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=28612
>>
>> KDE: isn't she a beauty? Has anybody noticed the sheer amount of styles,
>> themes and extentions on kde-look.org recently? That's the power of
>> contribution from third parties or volunteers.
>
> Whatever floats your boat but personally, I think it's a mess.
Yes, it definitely is. This is not my desktop, which tends to be 'cleaner'.
The older KDE 3.1 desktop is rarely in a state that can be described as
messy.
http://baine.smb.man.ac.uk:8001/archive/images.html
No visual clutter.
Roy
|
|
