Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Graffiti question/annoyance

  • Subject: Re: Graffiti question/annoyance
  • From: AaronJ <noemail@noemail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:25:48 GMT
  • Newsgroups: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot
  • Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
  • References: <3jf1noFp7398U1@individual.net> <1121080333.510555.121190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> <h435d1tskcdfbkngpeq5fircuuktf347ha@4ax.com> <ol35d15m2rftj6uelbv542tq7udne7au0i@4ax.com> <db0bso$s9b$1@aken.eed.ericsson.se> <db0dpe$1gb$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <2ft7d1djh7ljf85nheudunnaj7074pd7jf@4ax.com> <db0tbs$5kj$3@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.sys.palmtops.pilot:303543
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:

>AaronJ wrote:

>> Palm had no choice. A judge had ruled that Graffiti 1 infringed on a
>> patent Xerox held on a handwriting recognition method called Unistrokes.
>
>Excellent. So every Palm user has to suffer. 

Well actually Palm did have choice to keep G1: Pay Xerox $$$ to license it.
Instead they chose to make you suffer (your words) with G2. Course some would
argue that the cost of that licensing would have shown up in the increased price
of the next model so you would have suffered anyway... ;)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index