Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Dave Liquorice wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:39:49 +0000, Michael Rozdoba wrote:
>>> I subscribe to a few mailing lists, many of which refuse to add a
>>> reply-to line pointing to the list, claiming this is broken
>>> behaviour.
>>
>> Me too, but I see it as a broken list...
>
> Yes, broken mailing list system probably. What is it run by? Mailman?
>
> I have had similar problems with Horde, but not with Neomail IIRC. Best
> thing to do is copy and paste the address of the mailing list (*). Just
> make sure you remember to always do so. If you mistakenly reply to sender,
> the embarrassment is small anyhow...
>
>>> The response to raising this on the list/s is that one should use a
>>> decent mail client that provides a reply-to-list button.
>
> Decent = non-existent. I don't even think Outlook has widget named
> 'reply-to-list'. A list is a list. If works properly, its 'reply-to'
> address must always be the mailing list's, not the sender's.
Bollocks, why would you be even considering Outlook as the end all and b all
of mailing programs, this is a linux group in case you had forgotten.
Kmail certainly has a reply to mailing list and a reply to all option.
>
>> I don't think I have seen a "reply-to-list" button ever. Reply-to-all
>> is another matter, that works. B-) You just have to remember to edit
>> out address's other than the list. I hate the dupes you get from these
>> lists when others use reply-to-all.
Haven't looked very hard then see above, since you are using KDE..
--
*~~~~~~~~~~~Thor
|
|
