On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 20:42:01 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ Big Bill ] on Sunday 30 April 2006 20:38 \__
>
>> On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 18:49:43 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>__/ [ Stacey ] on Sunday 30 April 2006 15:00 \__
>>>
>>>> "index-match" <mailtumengyu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:1146404708.760508.324450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> does anyone know Sergey Brin's email?
>>>>
>>>> sergey.brin@xxxxxxxxxx :-)
>>>
>>>No necessarily. Someone whom I know in Google, let us call him Anony Mous,
>>>has the E-mail address amous@xxxxxxxxxx . It appears as though the account
>>>does not have considerably strong filters. I believe that Steve Ballmer and
>>>Bill Gates receive something like 50,000 spam per day
>>
>> and frankly, that's not Nearly Enough!!
>>
>> BB
>
>Ironically, some studies show that 80% of all the spam originates from
>Windows machines which have been compromised (i.e. hijacked due to O/S
>vulnerabilities). In a sense, Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates have brought this
>upon themselves.
Which I meant. Let them be hoist upon their own petards and in future
learn to offer secure operating systems. Out of alpha would be an
improvement.
BB
--
http://www.kruse.co.uk/sandbox.htm
http://www.here-be-posters.co.uk/lithographs.htm
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/willow-tree/index.html
|
|
