On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:33:35 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
> On 2006-08-06, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:14:11 GMT, Sinister Midget wrote:
>>> On 2006-08-06, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted something concerning:
>>>> On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 13:26:03 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>> That's a Windows 9x blue screen. These are very different form an NT based
>>>> bluescreen which will show a stack dump as part of the trace.
>>>> Someone has photoshopped a Windows 9x bluescreen on top of the image.
>>> I'm probably wrong. But I thought having "funny-picture-of-the-day" in
>>> the URL was a dead giveaway that it wasn't on the up and up.
>>> (I wonder if there's an exploit in Outhouse Excrement that gets
>>> triggered when a subject line is too long.)
>> Then perhaps Roy shouldn't be reporting it as "news"?
> You followed the tradition. Maybe you should eat a little of your own
> dog food, too.
>> Further, just because something is funny, doesn't mean it's automatically
>> implied that it's fake.
> That's true. But context means everything. So does appearance. And this
> particular one was sloppy enough to notice.
It sure fooled Roy.
> So I imagine you believe all of those other things on there. Like
It's a joke.
Actually, those are all true. I've hear (and even used) most of them at
some time or another.
Quotes people have made, which makes them real.