Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Hadron Quark ] on Thursday 17 August 2006 17:03 \__
>
>> Au79 <au79@xxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> mlw wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know you probably mean well, but it is behaving more like spam than
>>>> actual advocacy. It is getting in the way of seeing/finding discussions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you feel compelled to post [News] could you batch all your stories in
>>>> one or two messages a day?
>>>
>>> I think that Roy's posts are appreciated by most users. I enjoy reading
>>> them and feel that this is what advocacy is all about: information.
>>>
>>> You may think that advocacy is simply a shouting match between wintrolls,
>>> but the way to win mind and hearts is still information.
>>
>> Which can be posted as a *single* article. No one says his posts dont
>> have *some* interest, but the volume of posts is nothing more than spam.
>
> How will you manage a hierarchy of threads? Hypothetical example:
>
> Post X contains 20 news items. 5 are about Microsoft/Apple deficiencies, 5
> are about open source, and 10 are related to Linux. If a person /x/
> replies
Reply to post with a snip of theunnecessary links. Easy. Each comes as a
subthread. Which a good newsreader can handle and kill if necessary.
|
|
