begin oe_protect.scr
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Thursday 17 August 2006 07:22 \__
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> __/ [ Hadron Quark ] on Wednesday 16 August 2006 22:05 \__
>>>
>>>> 7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Google talks up smart software for reliability
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>>> | However, Pike did say that nowadays Google's servers are
>>>>>>>> | custom-designed and run Red Hat Linux with a modified kernel.
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | [...]
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | Pike said he doesn't believe Google could have achieved this level
>>>>>>>> | of reliability with Windows.
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | "It was a good decision [to choose Linux] because it made it so
>>>>>>>> | flexible in the way you can do it," he said.
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | [...]
>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>> | Pike then jokingly said if Microsoft's claims about the number of
>>>>>>>> | Windows administrators required per server were true compared to
>>>>>>>> | Linux, "Google would be a much bigger company".
>>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;1225434946;fp;2;fpid;1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If Google invalidated micoshaft sys admin studies, then there
>>>>>>> is no reason for ANY small, medium or large sized businesses,
>>>>>>> educational establishments, charities and governments to
>>>>>>> believe micoshaft funded studies ever again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who or what is "micoshaft"? Some kind of census company?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh nah. Its some kind of employer of asstroturfing
>>>>> trolls who try to pass themselves off here as windope users
>>>>> when in fact they are actually illiterate cut and paste idiots
>>>>> lacking basic computer knowledge.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for clarifying that you are a total waste of bandwidth.
>>>
>>> He makes good points sometimes.
>>
>> Rather more of them than Mr Quark, who's a Microsoft astroturfer and
>> shouldn't be here at all.
>
> In HQ's defence, I very much doubt it. See the E-mail which discusses posting
> history... *wink*
>
I did, but that might've just been collecting dirt.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
TONY RANDALL! Is YOUR life a PATIO of FUN??
|
|
