On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:56 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ BearItAll ] on Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:13 \__
>
>> cc wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>>> > Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> SCO Quietly Seeks Another Review of IBM Decision
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>> >> | SCO wants U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball to take another look at
>>>> >> | his Nov. 29 decision to uphold Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells' June
>>>> >> | ruling to drop 187 of SCO's list of nearly 300 code-related
>>>> >> | allegations against IBM. Observers have said the decision left
>>>> >> | the Utah company with a near-worthless shell of a contract and
>>>> >> | copyright case.
>>>> >> `----
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54783.html
>>>>
>>>> > oops, when I was scanning through the subjects I read that line as
>>>> > 'SCO Getting Really Depressed', I suppose its an understandable mistake
>>>> > for my subconcious to make.
>>>>
>>>> > I'm sorry SCO but sometimes when you see the chap standing on the
>>>> > bridge all you can really say to him is 'Yes mate, your life really is
>>>> > shite, best to jump'.
>>>>
>>>> In SCO's case, I'd be quite happy to give them a firm push.
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is Mark Kent and Peter Kohlmann to take these comments out of
>>> context and call you both immoral for promoting suicide and murder?
>>
>> lighten up cc
>
> It's actually people like HQ and Gary+++ that take such things out of
> context, not Peter and Mark.
Actually no it's not Roy.
It WAS Mark Kent.
Your boy.
LieNIXIng again?
It was Mark Kent who took Oliver Wong's comments way out of context
and accused him of supporting the above....
And of course when Mark Kent was losing the debate badly, like he usually
does, he killfiles the person and accuses him of being a Microsoft
employee.
Yea Roy, that's your boy Mark Kent.
|
|
