flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:56 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> __/ [ BearItAll ] on Wednesday 20 December 2006 12:13 \__
>>
>>> cc wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> BearItAll <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> did eloquently scribble:
>>>>> > Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> SCO Quietly Seeks Another Review of IBM Decision
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>> >> | SCO wants U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball to take another look at
>>>>> >> | his Nov. 29 decision to uphold Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells' June
>>>>> >> | ruling to drop 187 of SCO's list of nearly 300 code-related
>>>>> >> | allegations against IBM. Observers have said the decision left
>>>>> >> | the Utah company with a near-worthless shell of a contract and
>>>>> >> | copyright case.
>>>>> >> `----
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54783.html
>>>>>
>>>>> > oops, when I was scanning through the subjects I read that line as
>>>>> > 'SCO Getting Really Depressed', I suppose its an understandable mistake
>>>>> > for my subconcious to make.
>>>>>
>>>>> > I'm sorry SCO but sometimes when you see the chap standing on the
>>>>> > bridge all you can really say to him is 'Yes mate, your life really is
>>>>> > shite, best to jump'.
>>>>>
>>>>> In SCO's case, I'd be quite happy to give them a firm push.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Where is Mark Kent and Peter Kohlmann to take these comments out of
>>>> context and call you both immoral for promoting suicide and murder?
>>>
>>> lighten up cc
>>
>> It's actually people like HQ and Gary+++ that take such things out of
>> context, not Peter and Mark.
>
>
> Actually no it's not Roy.
>
> It WAS Mark Kent.
> Your boy.
>
> LieNIXIng again?
>
> It was Mark Kent who took Oliver Wong's comments way out of context
> and accused him of supporting the above....
>
> And of course when Mark Kent was losing the debate badly, like he usually
> does, he killfiles the person and accuses him of being a Microsoft
> employee.
>
> Yea Roy, that's your boy Mark Kent.
>
I cant ever recall twisting a thread. I might have made the odd mistake
with nomenclature, but bare faced fibbing? Nope. We leave that to Roy's
goodself, Mark Kent and KÃhlmann.
|
|
