William Poaster wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:04:46 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
> > __/ [ cc ] on Monday 18 December 2006 13:41 \__
> >
> >
> >> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> >>> __/ [ cc ] on Monday 18 December 2006 12:12 \__
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> > Roy Culley wrote:
> >>> >> ngstats.pl version 1.21
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This report covers 2654 articles received by this system to
> >>> >> newsgroup comp.os.linux.advocacy [1]
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> > As Roy S. would say, "Thank you, Roy, for the biased statistics."
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d15e2c554d331322?dmode=source&hl=en
> >>>
> >>> You seem to have a lot of spare time. Many of my remarks are, needless
> >>> to say, sarcastic/satirical.
> >>
> >> You telling me I have a lot of spare time is ironic. You make 20x more
> >> posts than I do. I have a good memory, and a simple search found it in
> >> about 2 minutes. So are these unbiased statistics then? The fact that he
> >> doesn't give a word on how he measures his quality posters, plus
> >> includes labels such as TROLL, IDIOT, and RACIST(which is terrible),
> >> should clue you in on the answer to that question.
>
> The labels TROLL, IDIOT, and RACIST are good descriptions IMO & let a
> newbie to the group know *exactly* who is what. If teh wintrolls,
> mactrolls & shills don't like it, they can always leave. They wouldn't be
> missed.
>
> >> [snip everything else that has nothing to do with my comments]
> >
> > That incident happened yesterday, so it was fresh in my mind. I used it to
> > argue a broader point.
>
> Which the OP apparently didn't like, hence the snip.
I'll leave alone your asinine comments about why the labels are valid.
You obviously won't ever be convinced otherwise. But to say I snipped
the comments because I didn't *like* them is incredibly stupid. The
story had nothing to do with what I posted. Nothing to do with Roy's
original comment about my spare time. In short, there was no reason for
it to be there, and there was nothing to comment on that was relevant,
so I snipped it. Please, please, please try to read the entire thread,
and understand the comments before you look like a fool.
|
|
