Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Monday 31 July 2006 14:35 \__
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> __/ [ Mark Kent ] on Monday 31 July 2006 11:51 \__
>>>>
>>>>> begin oe_protect.scr
>>>>> Roy Culley <rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>> ngstats.pl version 1.19
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This report covers 3111 articles received by this system to
>>>>>> newsgroup comp.os.linux.advocacy [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Toplist of Posters
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pos Poster Msgs Bytes
>>>>>> Quoted
>>>>>> 1. Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 479 498975
>>>>>> 47%
>>>>>> 2. Flatfish Nyms - TROLL / THIEF / LIAR / RACIST 274 300473
>>>>>> 47%
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary is trying very hard, I think, but even with all those nyms, he's
>>>>> still a solid 200 behind Roy, and nowhere near on replies...
>>>>
>>>> Replies to self don't count. Remember that socks talk to one
>>>> another. *smile*
>>>
>>> You and Mark dont count then I assume? *smile*
>>
>> Don't count what? *smile*
>
> He's just trying to stir things up. *sigh* It's sad when advocacy dialogues
> can no longer be properly discerned from insults, drivel, personal attacks,
> and one liners.
How is it ok for Mark to be about the sole replyer to your "hundreds of
linux related" articles and not ok for the others he mentioned to reply
to each other? In most certainly am not trying to stire things up: sauce
for the goose is sauce for the gander. It seems you seem the first to
accuse people of being trolls, sock puppets etc, but when questioned
about your own posting ethics you get all high & mighty.
--
|
|
