On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:27:49 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
> begin oe_protect.scr
> Oliver Wong <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>
>> "Mark Kent" <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:g75ip3-vod.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> <snip microsoft sales cr@p>
>>
>> You snipped the main body of my argument without addressing it. =(
>>
>> (BTW, Trusted Computing isn't a "Microsoft-only" concept.)
>>
>
> I addressed it very directly - it's about who's in control of the
> computer.
No you didn't.
You waffled all over the place.
> The main part I snipped was not your argument, it was
> something you'd pulled from a Wiki, which is sales pitch for the whole
> concept of putting control of /your/ computer into the hands of someone
> else.
Baloney.
You snipped the main part of his argument.
> I notice that you failed to answer any of my very valid points,
Maybe that's because none of your points were valid much less *very* valid.
>
> You have one more chance to attempt to address this before you go into
> the killfile, as you look basically like a new, improved Erik F at the
> moment, to me.
Ooooo I'll bet his scared!
Not the killfile.
Oh no!
Not that!
BTW your head/ego, Mark Kent, seems to be growing even faster that
Shysterwitch's and that is quite an accomplishment.
> Of course, if you can come up with a genuine benefit for me, regarding
> why a third-party should determine what should run on my computer, /or/
> accept that your point is, in fact, just Microsoft/RIAA/MPAA/Intel
> marketing, then I'll listen.
I really doubt he gives a rat's ass if you listen or not.
Neither does anyone else.
|
|
