On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 17:26:46 -0400, compton.plaines_kid@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:38:35 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>
>> Mine too - he's doing a fantastic job. Also, if you look at the group
>> charter, he's spot on target, whereas Erik Funkenbusch is invariably
>> posting off-charter. Erik F should be in a windows advocacy group.
>
> It also seems like you Mar Kent are making a concerted effort to reply to
> as many of Roy's articles as possible in order to increase the obvious
> pitiful number of replies he gets.
Who cares how many replies he gets? This isn't a competition, you know.
> That makes you a shill Mark Kent.
??? How do you make that out?
> For the most part Roy is talking to an empty room.
No, he's talking to COLA. Most posters who've said anything about his
postings have encouraged him to continue. That seems to suggest they serve
a useful purpose. Unlike you.
>
> It's also fairly obvious that out of the massive number of articles Roy
> posts, pretty much the only ones that generate any form of two way dialog
> are the Microsoft Bashing articles.
So what? Post something positive about Linux, then.
> Says a lot about Linux Advocacy.
Says we are sick of MS and Windows fucking things up, seems to me.
>
> A troll can post one Linux Sucks message and within two days it will have
> more responses than all of Roy's posts combined in total for a week.
Just shows what trolls are - twats.
|
|
