__/ [ Oliver Wong ] on Wednesday 19 July 2006 21:06 \__
> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:2215135.K4TFUFR02H@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | This one actually wasn't that bad. This time it was a technical problem
>> | with the webcast. Once again, companies just don't get it, they won't
>> | allow you to watch the webcast with anything other than the
>> | unacceptable security risk known as Internet Explorer.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33114
>
> I don't understand what "damage" was done. From my understanding, the
> author tried to view a webcast via FireFox, could not, and gave up. Is
> there more to it than that in this story?
It's one of these Inquirer articles that probably skip their
way past the editor's approval. The Register has some
similar articles where the title is probably carefully
chosen by the Editor-in-chief. Personally, I am not too fond
of such write-ups that resemble blogs, content-wise (also
narration).
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Prevalence does not imply ideali$M
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 12.7% user, 2.3% system, 0.6% nice, 84.5% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
