__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 21:33 \__
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:38:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 17:55 \__
>>
>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:33:20 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 16:46 \__
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:18:28 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 14:44 \__
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:17:14 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
>>>>>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>__/ [ Paul ] on Friday 02 June 2006 12:21 \__
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:04:16 GMT, "Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)"
>>>>>>>>> <PeTe33@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>>> You mean the canonical issue ?
>>> I never had a problem with that either
>>>
>>> Nor do I use google sites maps (another theory afaicr that was banded
>>> about)
>>
>>
>>These were speculations that I preferred to ignore.
>
> Same here. Also, I was never was one to jump on the latest gimmick.
I am yet to hear about a Google Sitemaps success story. So far, reports have
been moderate.
>>Fixing or changing would have been a PITA, time wise. If it's not broken
>>(site has always done well), why try to fix it? Unless, of course, there
>>were definite answers making the rounds.
>
>>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> it is a good example (for me) to check the other DCs
>
>>Yes, I use that tool.
>
> Could be better if you could run another query on the results page
> rather than using the back button.
>
> An offline edition where it saved results would be perfect ;)
>
> [..]
Have a look at:
http://tools.marketleap.com/siteindex/default.htm
Results are saved in-between sessions (for a given domain name) and then used
to form a nice saturation plot.
No multiple datacentres included though.
>>> I've been having some fun for the last few days. Whilst google is
>>> knackered and my hotlink filter is broken, I have been altering images
>>> on the site.
>>>
>>> One guy who advertises that he is a stud now has a gay man image as a
>>> background and a clairvoyant site now has a less desirable image on
>>> her site. I bet she didn't see that one coming. :)
>>
>>
>>These circumstances can be amusing. After 2 weeks of no response from a
>>large forum's administrators (I E-mailed with a gentle, polite request), I
>>had his avatar swapped with a picture of a penis. Not a complimentary
>>picture, I must add. My logs later indicated that many visitors witnessed
>>the shameful display before he had this rectified (pun intended).
>
> I don't think I could get away with that with my hosting company, but
> go as near the mark as possible.
Well, that was back in December 2004 when I had little to lose. Besides, the
only link to that image was off-site HotLinking. I changed the filename that
was embedded in my site temporarily.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | No SCO code was used to generate this sig
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
6:00am up 36 days 12:32, 10 users, load average: 2.16, 2.06, 1.68
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
