On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 22:21:31 -0400, DFS wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ ray ] on Wednesday 07 June 2006 01:37 \__
>>
>>> On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:42:56 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20060606/tc_cmp/188701822
>>>
>>> It also says that MS servers have 20% more available uptime than RHEL
>>> servers. I'm assuming that they all present at least 90% uptime - so
>>> MS would have to have better than 108% uptime - difficult to achieve!
>>
>> It's just pure FUD from Didiot. I'm sure she got/will get some
>> under-the-table dough for this 'study', as well as a rim job from her
>> beloved Bullmer.
>
> Lying
> Infantile
> Linux
> Idiot
> Plonk
> DFS
Considering you are always complaining that Roy is a liar when he posts
his news items, you're being a complete hypocrite. I didn't see you
criticise the OP of the original thread for making up a title which has
zero to do with the subject of the link he posted. Why is that?
Oh, I get it - it was anti-Linux, so that's okay with you.
--
Kier
|
|
