On Fri, 19 May 2006 16:57:01 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 19 May 2006 16:53 \__
>
>> On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:49:06 +0200, Borek
>> <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:46:56 +0200, Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems that that only DCs to trust atm are
>>>>
>>>> 64.233.167.99 42
>>>> 64.233.167.104 42
>>>> 64.233.167.147 42
>>>>
>>>> And I use the word trust lightly, but they are the only ones that seem
>>>> to be giving correct[ish] results.
>>>
>>>According to Paul? ;)
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>Borek
>>
>> According to Tippy :P:P:P:P
>
>I am assuming that "correct" is defined as "the way things used to be",
yes :)
> which is probably reasonable. Considering the Big Daddy chaos, it is safe to say
>that the way things used to be is the right way... or maybe not...
>
>Your call. *smile*
The other day when I did the same results, every single DC came back
with Not Found
The results I see from the DCs I mentioned are showing the results I
have had for many weeks. - Prior to all this problem we've seen
recently.
You call now :) ;)
plh
Paul
--
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
|
