Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Google DC's

  • Subject: Re: Google DC's
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:57:01 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <61qr62davol1cog4gthsja1cljbld80id6@4ax.com> <op.s9s174lx26l578@borek> <kfqr625di6v1t23qbn33946akfgn9ja30s@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Paul B ] on Friday 19 May 2006 16:53 \__

> On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:49:06 +0200, Borek
> <m.borkowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 19 May 2006 17:46:56 +0200, Paul B <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that that only DCs to trust atm are
>>>
>>> 64.233.167.99 42
>>> 64.233.167.104 42
>>> 64.233.167.147 42
>>>
>>> And I use the word trust lightly, but they are the only ones that seem
>>> to be giving correct[ish] results.
>>
>>According to Paul? ;)
>>
>>Best,
>>Borek
> 
> According to Tippy :P:P:P:P

I am assuming that "correct" is defined as "the way things used to be", which
is probably reasonable. Considering the Big Daddy chaos, it is safe to say
that the way things used to be is the right way... or maybe not...

Your call. *smile*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index