On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:18:32 +0100, Peter KÃhlmann wrote:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:52:28 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>>> Did you have a good holiday by the way
>>>
>>> Yes, a fine vacation. Lufthansa lost my suitcase (it's a pattern), but
>>> all in all I enjoyed being offline for 4 days.
>>
>> I'm sure you'll find a way to blame Windows for that.
>
> I'm sure we'll find a post from you even dumber than that
> If we just try hard enough. But it will be a close call
It's going to have to be a doozy to top this on from you Peter KÃhlmann:
********************************************************************
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/42c20cfa7ca49dae
Over here he accuses you of rigging the screenshots by turning of
anti-aliasing:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/82e012c465a...
"You mean, you deliberately selected different fonts/fontsizes?
And deselected Anti-aliasing too for KDE?
Figures, after all you are one of the most dishonest widiots around here"
Yet over here, he claims anti-aliasing has no effect on screen shots:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/628d7bbe0fe...
" BTW, it is so simple to test for yourself.
Do a screen-shot of a text. Now disable anti-aliasing
Do again screen-shot of same text.
Compare both. They are exactly the same"
Kohlmann once again proves his technical ineptness.
***********************************************************
Yes sir, that one is pretty difficult to top.
|
|
