Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Birmingham (UK) again - the full(er) story!

  • Subject: Re: Birmingham (UK) again - the full(er) story!
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:41:02 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <4t8kp9F12flu2U1@mid.individual.net> <4t8mgiF12uidgU1@mid.individual.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Gordon ] on Thursday 30 November 2006 18:33 \__

> B Gruff wrote:
>> hmm... this is a bit different from the earlier story......
>> 
>> http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?newsid=7459
> 
> As a retired Management and Systems Accountant I get very cross with the
> pro-MS contingent who focus (without exception) on the "now" cost,
> rather than the costs over a five or ten year period, in order to
> justify their "windows is cheaper than Linux" FUD. Fortunately, it
> appears that the people in Birmingham have seen through that....

Birmingham City Council claims open-source success

"The council does plan to begin migrating those desktops to its Suse
Professional 9.3-based desktop OS..."

I hope that this time, for a change, they will seek advice from those who
realise what's involved in terms of costs and required skills. *smile*

Criticism mounts over Birmingham's Linux project

,----[ Quote ]
| Several industry watchers have voiced their concerns about the project, 
| particularly around the number of PCs rolled out. Birmingham's expenditure 
| averaged over £2,500 per PC.
|
| "That's ridiculous," said Eddie Bleasdale, the owner of open-source
| consultancy NetProject and an early participant in the project. "It's
| an unbelievable cock-up... They decided to do it all themselves,
| without expertise in the area," he added, saying that a lack of
| skills in open source and secure desktops would undoubtedly have
| raised costs.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Mark Taylor, whose Open Source Consortium also exited the project
| in the early stages, said: "I have no idea how anyone could spend
| half a million pounds on 200 desktops, running free software".
| 
| Asked by ZDNet UK whether he was surprised that an XP upgrade was
| calculated as cheaper than the Linux project, Taylor said, "If it's
| done properly, that can't happen. It's amazing that anyone can spend
| that much on [Linux] project management." Taylor added that there
| are plenty of open-source skills in the Birmingham area which could
| have been utilised.
`----

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39284758,00.htm


Related:

LiMux The Penguin: Deep into Munich's Linux F/OSS migration

,----[ Quote ]
| Munich's Linux migration has been a publicity frenzy, a
| software patent poster child, and the subject of a debate
| on the role of government in technology mandates. Now it's
| a real-life IT project, and the key to success is training,
| management, and replacing 170 non-Linux applications.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Now, after enormous criticism and a nearly complete halt,
| it's becoming a successful migration if for very important
| reasons: it's going well, quietly, and on plan.
`----                       ^^^^^^^

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2006/110606-munich-linux.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index