B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sunday 08 October 2006 09:15 Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Roy Culley) writes:
>>
>>> begin risky.vbs
>>> <4oqurbFfu8qoU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>> On Sunday 08 October 2006 01:20 Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OK you two - so riddle-me-this....
>>>>
>>>> ...if he does NOT work at CERN, why is he using their good name in
>>>> his headers?
>>>> - simple enough question?:-)
>>>
>>> Yup. I obviously work there as well.
>>
>> Come on lads, you can do better than the usual gang up stuff. We all
>> know what can be forged in headers : Peter does it all the time to
>> pretend he uses Linux.
>
> Oh yes, of course they can be forged - but you see the "damned if you do,
> damned if you don't" in all this?
>
> In effect, you accuse Roy of bringing a University into disrepute. I don't
> think that he does that anyway, but you claim that he does, by posting in
> NGs and "associating" the university with his postings by his headers.
>
> YOU are either associated with (work for etc) CERN or you are not.
When did I ever claim I was associated with CERN? You guys are
crazy. You took my header to a pet project which I include just to boost
peoples exposure and you insinuate one from the other. Get a life.
>
> - if you DO work there, you are doing exactly what you accuse Roy of.
>
No I am not : because I am not accusing a company of maliciously
damaging peoples HW. Unless you can prove otherwise I suggest you change
the channel.
> - if you do NOT, it's actually imo WORSE! You (by your own reckoning) are
> bringing CERN into disrepute, and you actually have NO association with
> them!
>
Tell me, everytime Roy posts a link is he associating himself with being
an employee? Dont be such an ass.
--
Check it out, send me comments, and dance joyously in the streets,
-- Linus Torvalds announcing 2.0.27
|
|
