Hadron Quark wrote:
> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> begin oe_protect.scr
>> Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
< snip >
>>>> I knew it was a mistake for Mark to pander to the WinTrolls whims;
>>>
>>> No, it was not.
>>> We are hearing those shrill shrieks from flatfish, Erik F or Hadron
>>> Quark because they got exactly what they were asking for
>>
>> Well, yes indeed, they did. I'm doing exactly and precisely what they
>> asked for. Having done it, I'm finding it quite useful myself...
>
> No we didnt. We got a half assed job listing all Roy's garbage and a
> quadrillion repeated email headers.
>
Oh, you are asking for *another* version?
If you are real nice, I might be inclined to set up some script to assemble
it out of Roys posts and Marks digest. To make a "digest digest", so to
speak
Want it? Keep complaining and I might feel sorry for you poor guys and do
one that is even more concise than Marks digest
> We, or I maybe, asked for some common sense : list article headers and
> the links to the original posts next to them.
>
> Not a list of repeated headers then the whole lot *again* interspersed
> with Roy's email address and his inane comments.
>
> For someone who espouses to be so intelligent, you sure made a mess of a
> relatively simple concept.
>
Oh, it is not messed up at all
It is actually extremely good and useful
That you wintrolls disagree has no significance whatsoever
< snip >
--
Linux is for people who want to know why it works.
Mac is for people who don't want to know why it works.
DOS is for people who want to know why it does not work.
Windows is for people who don't want to know why it does not work.
|
|
