Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hadron Quark wrote:
>
>> Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>
>>>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:06 Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There have been oodles of posters who have stated their dislike for
>>>>>> Roy's spamming. There have been about 5 supporters of it : and I think
>>>>>> we can guess who they all are. Hint you are one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you mind listing them all for us?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Would you list all those that support these posts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> *That* should be an easy job for you. After all, you claim that only 5
>>> suport it
>>>
>>> After that you could start compiling that list of those hundreds of
>>> posters who "filtered the news posts because they flood the NG"
>>>
>>> Oh, BTW, you are a liar
>>
>> Just look at the replies to his spam News posts. It sums it all up
>> really.
>>
>> But keep going Peter : you know you love it.
>>
>
> In other words: Your claim was made out of full cloth
>
> Why am I not surprised?
> But then, you are a wintroll. Those tend to lie rather often
This coming from the "nym shift" accountant who refuses to back up his
ridiculous claims ? Did you get another pat on the back from Roy for
maintaining that, incorrect, list too? Good boy, now SIT! Sit I say!
Nothing would surprise me from you loony tunes.
--
Touch tone phones only.
|
|
