Hadron Quark wrote:
> Peter KÃhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>>
>>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 15:06 Hadron Quark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There have been oodles of posters who have stated their dislike for
>>>>> Roy's spamming. There have been about 5 supporters of it : and I think
>>>>> we can guess who they all are. Hint you are one.
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind listing them all for us?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. Would you list all those that support these posts?
>>>
>>
>> *That* should be an easy job for you. After all, you claim that only 5
>> suport it
>>
>> After that you could start compiling that list of those hundreds of
>> posters who "filtered the news posts because they flood the NG"
>>
>> Oh, BTW, you are a liar
>
> Just look at the replies to his spam News posts. It sums it all up
> really.
>
> But keep going Peter : you know you love it.
>
In other words: Your claim was made out of full cloth
Why am I not surprised?
But then, you are a wintroll. Those tend to lie rather often
--
"Last I checked, it wasn't the power cord for the Clue Generator that
was sticking up your ass." - John Novak, rasfwrj
|
|
